Loading

Happy 21st Birthday! Why we should change the legal drinking age

 

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he promise of being free, life with no parents, you are free to make your own decisions. Legally when you are 18 you’re considered an adult, expected to be able to make conscious decisions whether something will have a positive effect or bad ones. The legal age to consume alcohol is 21, although when you turn 18 you’re able to buy lottery tickets, enlist in the army, and vote for president. Why does being able to drink fall short at 18?

While 18-year-olds are not legally able to consume alcohol, surveys showed 72% of high schoolers have drunk more than a few sips by the end of their high school career. Statistics by SADD, say underage drinkers (12-20) that have consumed alcohol is around 26.4% and 17.4% were binge drinking alone, all in a month. The legal age of 21 is not stopping teens and young adults from drinking behind closed doors.

The Drinking and Driving Debate

Changing the legal drinking age is a hard thing to do because the biggest issue is drinking and driving. Around 1969 to 1979, the U.S it told states to raise their drinking age from 18 to 21, with some 30 states lowering it others followed quickly. This was due to Congress passing a bill in 1984, to raise the drinking age. The bill passed was called The National Minimum Drinking Age Act or loss 10% of state-federal highway funding would be taken out of state funding if they chose to keep the young drinking age of, 18. Requiring states to raise  the purchase and public use of alcohol to 21

illustration by Senior Airman Mike Meares Image labeled by good for non-commercial reuse.

In Europe, their legal drinking age is 18, with most Europeans knowing how to handle their alcohol. A big factor could be because they are exposed to alcohol at a younger age, and more open to alcohol use, not to saying some don’t binge.

Using Europe as a model for lowering the legal drinking age because of their level of respect, and control that young Europeans have when drinking.  If we look at most American colleges, many are known for or focused on drinking. While many of the students are doing the drinking illegally at a young age, it is overlooked majority of the time. When a high school student goes off to college, it is a popular activity to go out with friends and drink. Having many drinks in one sitting (binge drinking), 18-year-olds may not know their limit of when to stop. It can cause alcohol poisoning, and the number of reported cases increased from 779 people to 2,290 between 1998 and 2005 for 18-24-year-olds.

[perfectpullquote align=”left” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] “If highway safety really is the main concern, we’d accomplish much more by raising the driving age” In [/perfectpullquote]

the US. Americans don’t tend to speak about drinking habits, and what healthy choices should be made when thinking about drinking. Also what being safe should look like. Changing the age of something doesn’t just fix a problem, it holds it off.

Parents should talk to teens, and understand their child is growing up. Turning a blind eye to the real problem, only to fix it with something else does not help anyone. Taking into consideration of Europeans culture could be a great step to fixing this heated debate.

Does The Law Stop Anyone?

Most people believe states should be able to set their own drinking age, not the federal government. Today there are exceptions the laws, like Wyoming and Alaska where they allow underage consumption to take place on private premises as long as parental consent and supervision are given.

While six other states allow consumption on private property with parental consent, each state in the United States is allowed to make these type of laws. Although most states see no need too. A majority of countries around the world allow alcoholic drinks to be consumed with a much younger legal age than the US. We are one of the few to have the legal drinking age set to 21

Why it’s looked over

It may be thought that having a high legal drinking age will moderate potentially dangerous behaviors from happening, sadly it hasn’t. Most underage drinking occurs during frat parties, house parties, and beach parties. Most parties college parties are center around and drinking, and it is inevitable that binge drinking will occur. Causing other dangerous activities to occur. Many younger adults participate in this type of binge drinking behind closed doors. An article by Penn state “Approximately 1900 will die from injuries sustained while intoxicated, and 700,000 will be assaulted by a drunk student.  Alcohol is responsible for 100,000 sexual assaults or rapes every year.” The common issue is that too many underage drinking is taking place behind closed doors.

 

Image by pexels

If we look at our economy, lowering the legal age could help the economy. For the people who choose to come visit the USA, the college students on their ‘gap’ year won’t come because they cannot enjoy doing the same activities while in public, therefore choosing to go elsewhere. There is also music festivals or concerts that make the majority of the money on the presence of having a bar. Though it does not stop young people from obtaining alcohol by creating a fake ID.

The situation with the fake ID’s is not good, given the fact that the US has been dealing with many threats of terrorism, and the issue with our borders with people entering the US illegally. While legal Americans encourage the fake ID market. 

Across many states, there are not many resources that allow police to enforce the minimum drinking age causing it the law to be overlooked most of the time. Because each time an underage youth is taken in for drinking lots of time and warnings is given. As well as expensive paperwork must be filled out, this only happens in serious situations at best, that taken to court. 

Sum It Up

With each reason given it will be hard to change the minds of people that believe the age is working. Maybe 18 is not the answer though. For everyone’s main concern, highway safety is the one. “If highway safety really is the main concern, we’d accomplish much more by raising the driving age,” says an article by Laurence Steinberg.  

So torn in two directions, having twenty-one as the legal drinking age saves lives on the road, but also keeping it the way it does not stop underage and binge drinking from behind closed doors, where the law can’t stop them.

[perfectpullquote align=”right” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Many younger adults participate in this type of binge drinking behind closed doors   [/perfectpullquote]

With both these a concern maybe meeting in the middle, a compromise will work better. Laurence Steinberg, a professor of psychology at Temple University, favors lowering the legal drinking age to 19. This is because of the problem with universities, police cannot do much on the problem if half the population of students is legally allowed to drink. While it stops high school students from being able to drink, it doesn’t phase college drinkers. I would have to agree with what he is saying, because it does cut out high school students but college students are able to drink in safe and public environments, learning the right ways to control their drinking.

Featured Image by Adam Cohn 

svg

What do you think?

Show comments / Leave a comment

9 Comments:

  • student blogger

    May 17, 2018 / at 11:17 amsvgReply

    When you say “18-year-olds may not know their limit of when to stop” you’re simply going against your own point. 18 year olds aren’t responsible or mature with their drinking.. why should we put this potentially dangerous substance right into their waiting hands?

  • Adam

    May 16, 2018 / at 10:14 amsvgReply

    Driving is a much larger and more important part of our culture when compared to places like Europe. We have more drivers than any country on earth. It’s just a way of life here. Most places in Europe also have a higher minimum age of when a person can legally drive when compared to the United States. (18 in most cases) This makes a HUGE difference, especially considering Europeans drive less than the average American, because the first two years an American has their license is considered the most dangerous. They are FAR more likely to be involved in an accident, to go over the speed limit, whatever. It’s hard to compare different places when their culture and laws are much different than that of our own.

  • Carter

    May 16, 2018 / at 10:10 amsvgReply

    I really like this article, it is so insightful. I also agree that the legal drinking age should be lowered to 18. Many college students and high schoolers already underage drink, so it would not change much. If you can be considered to have enough responsibility to buy cigarettes and vote for the president, then you should be able to consume alcohol.

    • Stoo Dent Blogggar

      May 16, 2018 / at 5:10 pmsvgReply

      Not ALL college/high school students drink. Anyways, lowering the drinking age because it’s being broken makes no sense. With that logic, one could say, “Some people are murderers, so if we made a law saying it’s legal to murder someone, it wouldn’t change much.” People should change their actions to match the laws, not the other way around.

      • Carter

        May 17, 2018 / at 10:15 amsvgReply

        Murder and Teen drinking are completely different topics. Come back when you have a better argument. Also, where in my comment did I say ALL drink. The answer is nowhere, there is a Pearl Vision located past Dunn Bros if you need glasses.

        • Stoo Dent Blogggar

          May 17, 2018 / at 3:56 pmsvgReply

          You know what, you’re right. I do have a speck of sawdust in my eye. Now let me address the plank in yours:

          I realize you said “many”, and I changed the word to “all” to over-exaggerate. When you think about it, I was being generous. If ALL students really did drink, changing the law wouldn’t do much, as you said. By saying that MANY students drink, you acknowledge that there are those who don’t drink. Changing the law would change things, those who were not drinking before would be drinking now (after all, it is legal). You basically contradicted your own statement when you insisted on keeping the word “many.”

          And yes, murder and teen drinking are different things, but once again, I chose the example to over-exaggerate. While murder is a significantly worse crime than underage drinking (although it only causes about 3 times more casualties per year, come to find out) they are both still crimes when it comes down to it. You could take the sentence [“Some people _____, so if we made a law saying it is legal to ______, it wouldn’t change much.” ] and literally put ANY crime, misdemeanor, or wrong thing in those blanks, it would have the same effect. It still doesn’t make sense to change a law because people are breaking it, no matter how significant or insignificant that law is.

          • Carter

            May 29, 2018 / at 10:13 am

            Why would students that do no drink start drinking after it became legal, as many adults do not drink? It does make sense to change a law that is ONLY age based. YOUR POINT stating that you can fill in the blanks with any crime is completely false, as drinking is legal once you turn 21, just in case you did not know that. Once again you are just adding to your horrible points and are trying to justify them. You stated that you were over-exaggerating, and I do not think that is a good way to prove an argument. I think you yourself just proved that your argument was blown out of proportion and is invalid. Try again though 🙂

          • Stoo Dent Blogggar

            May 31, 2018 / at 11:13 am

            You’re right, again, and I’m sorry, again. I will no longer exaggerate anything to make my point. I will use clear, concise language that anyone, ANYONE, even you, can understand. 85% of adults have drank during their lifetimes, so… you’re wrong on that. As for age based laws, how about driving? Legally buying tobacco? Owning a gun??? (These things are all legal, once your a certain age, in case you didn’t know.) There’s a reason you need to be a certain age to do these things, just like there is a reason for the current drinking age. Lowering the age people can do these things lowers the maturity level present, and that only increases the danger for everyone involved. My point remains unscaved: changing a law because people are breaking it is dumb. You have yet to disagree on that.

        • Adam

          May 20, 2018 / at 7:14 pmsvgReply

          Most people who want to lower the minimum age to participate in any potentially harmful act probably only wants it lowered only because they themselves want to participate in that activity, without the legal ramifications.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading
svg
Quick Navigation
  • 01

    Happy 21st Birthday! Why we should change the legal drinking age