Loading

People Over Pipelines

Beloved president, Teddy Roosevelt once said, “I don’t go so far as to think that the only good Indians are dead Indians, but I believe nine out of ten are, and I shouldn’t like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth.”

Since the white man first discovered the new world, Native Americans have been stepped over, betrayed, and slaughtered. Their lands have been taken and destroyed, their culture has been disrespected, and their people have been forced onto unclean land, or killed simply for being Native American. Even today, many still suffer due to the horrors of the past.

A current issue Native American people are facing is the Dakota Access Pipeline, which plans to transport crude oil from North Dakota, all the way to Illinois over a stretch of 1,172 miles. At first this might not seem like such a wrongful thing, but the construction of this pipeline means absolute chaos for the Standing Rock tribe that live on this land.

The Construction Plan

Dakota Access, LLC, the company that is constructing the pipeline says that this pipeline will be clean and reliable, but data says differently. According to Natural News, “a 34-inch pipeline owned by Enbridge energy operating in Will County, Illinois leaked more than 6, 400 barrels of Saskatchewan heavy crude oil.”   That’s more than 250,000 gallons of crude oil being dumped right into the Standing Rock Sioux tribe’s drinking water. Time and time again, oil pipelines spill. They just aren’t safe. Since 2010 there has an estimated 200 spills a year. A couple spills here and there mean nothing to big businesses, they especially mean nothing to the government, but that does not take away the dramatic impacts on small communities.

The land they are trying build on, does not even legally belong to them. It belongs to the Great Sioux Reservation, not the US Native American tribes are sovereign nations.

“In the year 2016, we should not continue to trample on Native American sovereignty. We should not endanger the water supply of millions of people. ” — Sen. Bernie Sanders

Water Pollution 

Native Americans hold water near and dear. They use it as their first source of medicine. This article by MEHR News Agency says, “The tribe’s subsistence and their physical and cultural health will be threatened due to potential contamination by oil spills directly impacting their drinking water.” This is why they have rights to their reservation lands and water. They have treaties with the US government that are in place to protect them from anything that would harm their resources.

Native Americans are protected under the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of indigenous peoples, including the “right to health, right to water and subsistence, threats against sacred sites including burial grounds, treaty rights, cultural and ceremonial practices, free prior and informed consent, traditional lands and resources including water, productive capacity of the environment, and self-determination.”

Senator Bernie Sanders spoke out against the contamination of the tribe’s water: “We cannot allow our drinking water to be poisoned so that a handful of fossil fuel companies can make even more in profits… This pipeline must be stopped! … Stop the pipeline, respect Native American rights and let us move forward to transform our energy systems away from fossil fuels.” Still, as more people are speaking out against the pipeline, nothing is being done.

NoDAPL demonstration in front of EPA, December 10th, 2016 / Victoria Pickerling / CC

Water is a Basic Human Right

According to article 5 of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” I don’t know about you, but denying thousands of people the most important and basic necessity of life is pretty degrading and inhuman. Even the UN agrees this is atrocious. They believe that the US government should give the tribe, “a fair, independent, impartial, open and transparent process to resolve this serious issue and to avoid escalation into violence and further human rights abuses.”

Violence Against Protesters

The First Amendment. The one that everybody knows, freedom of speech. Under the United States Constitution, people have a right to gather and speak out against injustices. Yet the lives of the protesters are in danger. Protesters are being shot at with water cannons in below freezing weather, and police have become increasingly more violent while protesters have remained peaceful.

DESMOG states in their article, “Several protesters — including a child and a pregnant woman — were bitten by security dogs and 30 suffered from the affects of pepper spray.” These people have rights, rights that the government are refusing to protect.

“The brutality we’ve seen in recent days involving rubber bullets, tear gas, and water cannons, has increasingly put the health and lives of the demonstrators at real risk” – Sen. Martin Heinrich

 

NoDAPL demonstration in front of EPA, December 10th, 2016 / Victoria Pickerling / CC

Sacred Grounds Are Being Destroyed

Many sacred sites of the Standing Rock Sioux have been, and will continue to be bulldozed over if construction resumes. These are important places that need to be preserved, and the government has absolutely no regard for the importance of them. The Dakota Access, LLC claim they want to, “protect and restore the environment to at least similar conditions before [they] started.” Does that sound like a company that truly respects a group of people’s culture and beliefs? It sounds more like they want to hurry up and make a profit despite the suffering of innocent people.

Even if they do decide to lift a helping finger, the damage has already been done. Sacred sites will have been completely torn up and out of the ground. ICTMN says, “Nearly 1,300 archaeologists and museum representatives had called for the federal government to do more to protect the tribe’s sacred sites.” Clearly, they have options to protect this land, they just will not.

This is real, the US has abused these people, they are violently trying to take land that is not theirs. This is destroying peoples lives, culture and the planet.

Featured image credits:

Women’s Solidarity with Standing Rock / Peg Hunter /  CC

svg

What do you think?

Show comments / Leave a comment

26 Comments:

  • Donna

    March 3, 2017 / at 9:25 amsvgReply

    Sarah I just want you to know I love you and value our friendship.

    • Sarah

      March 7, 2017 / at 9:09 amsvgReply

      thank you donna i love you too

  • Evan

    March 2, 2017 / at 7:49 amsvgReply

    First thing: The Dakota access pipeline is not being built on the Standing Rock Tribe’s Reservation, it is on private land. (https://daplpipelinefacts.com/)
    Second: “Protester violence” They are not on public land, it is private so they all are trespassing, the police are using non-lethal tactics, and the protests are not all “peaceful”. (Nice video for the topic, 2:50 for protesters) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPOrQSeT7pg).
    And Third: When you said “The Dakota Access, LLC claim they want to, “protect and restore the environment to at least similar conditions before [they] started”Does that sound like a company that truly respects a group of people’s culture and beliefs?” Are you forgetting the cleanup that are needed because the protestors left cars, campers, tents, and garbage? Leaving the land worse than when they got there? (http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/01/31/dapl-protest-cleanup/)

    • EmilyK

      March 2, 2017 / at 9:00 amsvgReply

      check ur privilege lololol

      • Evan

        March 2, 2017 / at 10:26 amsvgReply

        Lol I will check my privilege when you check your facts 🙂

    • Sarah

      March 2, 2017 / at 9:06 amsvgReply

      I am sorry that you are too close minded to see the importance of this article. Seriously, who argues with giving people clean water and respect?

      • Evan

        March 2, 2017 / at 9:39 amsvgReply

        The point of this pipeline is to move the crude oil faster, cheaper, and with lower carbon emissions to the environment, with the low rate of leaks, and less fuel used to transport it. So why is the pipe so controversial?

        • Sarah

          March 2, 2017 / at 10:59 amsvgReply

          Because people’s sacred lands are being destroyed, you obviously don’t understand because white males don’t really experience oppression but it’s kind of a big deal to rip up burial grounds that don’t belong to you.

        • Madeline

          March 3, 2017 / at 1:00 amsvgReply

          Kinda funny we continue looking for ways to transport oil faster when we could be completely dependent from oil in 7-10 years….

      • Samuel

        March 3, 2017 / at 9:12 amsvgReply

        Well, it’s not arguing against clean water and respect. It’s arguing that no water is at threat and no disrespect has happened/will happen.

        Btw, can you provide a source for the claim that “Many sacred sites of the Standing Rock Sioux have been, and will continue to be bulldozed over if construction resumes. “?

    • Maddie

      March 2, 2017 / at 10:30 amsvgReply

      The fact that you can sit here and try to defend this oil company breaks my heart. That we actually think destroying sacred land and burial grounds is “ok” and that they intend to “Protect and restore the environment to at least similar conditions before [they] started” makes it all better. And as to your comment about how they left a lot of cleanup, can you blame them? We’re building an oil pipeline through lands that are sacred to their tribe! If that was my sacred land they were desecrating I’d be pretty pissed off too. Sacred by definition is “connected with God (or the gods) or dedicated to a religious purpose and so deserving veneration”. So it’s essentially if a company said “hey I’m gonna destroy your church and build an oil pipeline where it was! But it’s okay! We’re gonna try to make it at least kinda like it was!”. If I continue I’m gonna start to get mean so I’m gonna stop here .#nodapl

      • Evan

        March 2, 2017 / at 11:43 amsvgReply

        I am not defending the Oil Company, if they were wrong I would say they are. Im saying the pipe is better for the environment than transporting by train, it is far enough underground it will not affect their water. It is not on their reservation, and if it is their sacred land, why is it an issue now? Why not the other 8 pipes were put in?

  • Donna

    March 1, 2017 / at 2:51 pmsvgReply

    I’m glad you touch on the fact that the pipeline will disrupt burial grounds and other sacred lands, since that’s really the biggest issue people should have with the pipeline.

    I don’t agree with you on the pollution risk though.

    Pipeline leaks and ruptures are often overblown and exaggerated in media. They’re seen as a bigger pollutant because yes, they do spill more oil per rupture than say, a tanker, but pipelines spill much, much less often than the other most common modes of oil/gas transport (railroads, trucks, and tankers).

    the best analogy for this is comparing airplanes to automobiles. Sure, plane crashes are far deadlier than car crashes, but they’re also much rarer. More people die in car crashes than they do in plane crashes. It’s the exact same for pipelines.

    compared to trains, boats, and trucks, pipelines contribute the least amount of pollution. For the time being, they are the safest mode for transportation of oil and gas.

    sources:
    http://gatewaypanel.review-examen.gc.ca/clf-nsi/dcmnt/rcmndtnsrprt/rcmndtnsrprtvlm1-eng.pdf
    http://www.row1.ca/thoughts/probability-of-a-spill
    https://www.propublica.org/article/pipelines-explained-how-safe-are-americas-2.5-million-miles-of-pipelines (this one is really good)

    • Sarah

      March 2, 2017 / at 9:23 amsvgReply

      Thank you for your input Donna, it was very insightful. However, pipelines are still not clean, and this water is precious. Standing Rock should not have to risk their lands for profit of big companies. Even if it the safest way, oil should not be spilling into the environment at all.

      • Donna

        March 2, 2017 / at 10:01 amsvgReply

        Thank you for your input Sarah, it was very insightful. However, at this point in time we don’t really have a choice. Of course we shouldn’t be spilling oil or polluting water, and I’m all for switching to renewable sources of energy, but at this point in time it’s not realistic. Oil production isn’t expected to peak until 2030, so until then, oil transport will continue to be a growing business.

        Until renewable sources of energy are practical enough to use, pipelines will still be the best option for the environment.

        • Madeline

          March 3, 2017 / at 1:03 amsvgReply

          I know this entire article isn’t about other sources of energy, but there are SOOOO many ways to get clean renewable energy besides the expensive ways of solar, wind, and water. There are biofuels from algae and ways to get petroleum from garbage, and these two single methods together could be accomplished with minimal funding within 7-10 years if the government stopped letting oil continue its monopoly and gave its funding to scientists. Just saying.

      • Evan

        March 2, 2017 / at 10:04 amsvgReply

        The small section under the river where it is being build already has 8 pipes under the lake, 1 pair has been there for 35 years, and there have been no major leaks. Pipes are one of the safest ways to transport crude, and it is over 90 feet underground, that’s low enough that is would not affect the water table if there was a small leak because is would settle under the clay over 100 feet underground. It is the safest pipe ever built, and meets all federal guidelines.
        https://daplpipelinefacts.com/
        https://daplpipelinefacts.com/common-misconceptions/
        http://standingrockfactchecker.org/fact-checking-srst-claims-9-7-16/

  • Sydney

    March 1, 2017 / at 11:00 amsvgReply

    This article is amazing. #NoDAPL

  • Maddie

    March 1, 2017 / at 10:12 amsvgReply

    I absolutely love this article! I like the inclusion of quotes from government officials, it really adds to the credibility of the article! Over all it is very well written and stays true to the facts.

  • Joe

    March 1, 2017 / at 9:06 amsvgReply

    #NoDAPL

    • Evan

      March 2, 2017 / at 1:16 pmsvgReply

      #VeryMuchDAPL

Leave a Reply to Donna Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading
svg
Quick Navigation
  • 01

    People Over Pipelines